Moscow parade as a test for European leaders

Moscow parade as a test for European leaders

The Kremlin is working via all diplomatic and unofficial channels to ensure the attendance of European Union leaders at a fancy gig in Moscow dedicated to Victory Day celebrations.

The Russian embassy in Croatia was instructed to ensure that this country’s president Zoran Milanović visits Moscow on June 24.  Taking into account the confirmed participation of the Serbian President, Alexander Vučić, having both heads of state standing next to Vladimir Putin is supposed to emphasize Russia’s leadership in the Balkans, as well as its ability to influence NATO allies in the region.

The Covid-19 pandemic, which caused a health system crisis and peak incidence rates in Europe, forced the Russian leadership to postpone celebrations until June 24, 2020.  The delay completely changes the meaning of the event, as it is no longer associated with the WWII end date.  Moreover, the military parade is scheduled for a date that is only two days different from the anniversary of WWII outbreak for Russia.  Thus, instead of logically canceling this year’s celebration, Moscow is pushing forward with the idea and chooses the new date that is 2 months earlier than the alternative date known to mark the the official end of World War 2 – September 2 (the date Japan signed capitulation papers).

Despite the fact that September 2 would be a logical date for the transfer of festivities, many in Moscow associate with the U.S. role in the victory over Emperor Hirohito’s Japan.  Therefore, the date had no chances of being approved at the highest level.

Demonstration of the key role of Russia in WWII victory is extremely important for Russian leaders who have been exploiting the topic to consolidate Russian society, maintain and develop militaristic sentiments, as well as pursue foreign policy speculations, such as in the case of Poland.

The Kremlin is interested in making Russians believe in the looming external threat of fascism in order to justify own policy of aggression and influence on voters, who relate to this kind of threat much more than to that of totalitarianism, lack of freedom of speech, fair elections and competition in politics.  For the Kremlin, a military parade is about propaganda of fear, creating the illusion that everyone around Russia seeks to undermine and destroy the country. This way, the Kremlin strives to unite the country around an authoritarian leader.  This has been widely practiced in N.Korea, China, Iran, Venezuela and other non-democracies.

Geopolitical significance

Moscow festivities are also of great geopolitical importance to Russia.  Firstly, this is an attempt to neutralize political consequences of sanctions imposed over the annexation of Crimea and the war Russia has been waging in eastern Ukraine.  Secondly, this is an attempt to legitimize representatives of the self-proclaimed puppet republics. According to Kremlin’s official reports, president of the unrecognized Abkhazia Aslan Bzhaniya and head of the unrecognized South Ossetia Anatoly Bibilov have confirmed attendance.  According to unverified reports, the arrival is also expected of leaders of “LPR” and “DPR” puppet republics, as well as of Transnistria.  Moscow believes that their presence at events alongside European political leaders will create the appearance of their recognition and set up conditions for their direct personal contact with the heads of European states. The Kremlin wants to do a PR  stunt where European leaders will be seen standing next to those in formal charge of puppet territories. The relevant footage and pictures are later to be spun via a range of propaganda tools across Europe.

Military demonstration

Organizers announced a 1.5-hour increase in the event’s timing. This is due to 10 additional marching units being involved, sporting WWII-era military uniform, as well as obsolete T-34 tanks and self-propelled SU-100 artillery still stored in Russian warehouses only in order to maintain formal numerical superiority over adversaries in armored vehicles. The main reason for the increased timing though is the expected showcasing of new types of weapons: anti-aircraft missile systems and military air defense systems, coastal missile systems, remote mining vehicles, tanks, and infantry fighting vehicles.

Thus, at events dedicated to celebrating the end of the war, Russian leadership seeks to set a clear militaristic narrative, much like in Nazi Germany of 1930s where military parades were a symbol of superiority and expansion. In a bid to oppose fascism, the Kremlin completely took upon itself all of its attributes: militarism, intolerance, and nationalism.

The official goal of the upcoming military parade is to claim the rebirth of Russia after the war and the defensive potential that will not allow another  invasion and occupation of its territory.  However, Russia’s military involvement  in the wars in Syria and Libya, the occupation of Georgia, the war being waged in Ukraine, and the annexation of Crimea, speaks of a message of intimidation and aggression. The key recipients of this message today are the 12 heads of state of the Commonwealth of Independent States, Russia’s post-Soviet project.  Russia is sending them a clear signal that it seems unacceptable any attempts to withdraw from the orbit of its influence. However, at the same time, Moscow leaves itself no hope for expanding such influence across Europe, using the mechanisms, rhetoric and symbolism of those defeated 75 years ago.